Dhondi Rama Naik(Legal Heir) vs Pandurang Laxman Naik Advocate - K. B. Desai — 20/2020

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38. Status: For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO200001112020

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

34/2020

Filing Date

21-03-2020

Registration No

20/2020

Registration Date

02-06-2020

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38

Petitioner(s)

Dhondi Rama Naik(Legal Heir)

Adv. Bharat S. Patil1.

Maruti Dhondi Naik

Gundu Rama Naik(Legal Heir) 2.

Pandurang Gundu Naik(Legal Heir) 2.1.

Shobha @ Chaya Pandurang Naik 2.1.

Amol Pandurang Naik 2.1.

Vinayak Pandurang Naik 2.

Laxmi Gundu Naik 2.

Bhagwan Gundu Naik

Kisha @ Krushna Rama Naik(Legal Heir) 3.

Sanjay Krushna Naik 3.

Shahaji Krushna Naik

Respondent(s)

Pandurang Laxman Naik Advocate - K. B. Desai

Ananda Laxman Naik(Legal Heir)

Banda Laxman Naik(Legal Heir) 3.

Rupali Vilas Naik

Shivaji Laxman Naik(Legal Heir)

Rangrao Laxman Naik

Sushila Pandurang Patil

Banubai Shivaji Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

16-03-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

05-01-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

04-12-2025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

04-12-2025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

09-10-2025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

Interim Orders

20-02-2023
Order on T.I.
11-07-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 20/2020 The petitioners filed a review application under CPC Order 39 Rule 4 challenging an earlier order dated 20.02.2023 on a maintenance petition. The respondents argued the review petition was not maintainable as the petitioners had not appealed to the higher court within the required timeframe and no legal provision supported the relief sought. The court found the review application deserving of acceptance on merits. The petition was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 20/2020 The petitioners filed a review application under CPC Order 39 Rule 4 challenging an earlier order dated 20.02.2023 on a maintenance petition. The respondents argued the review petition was not maintainable as the petitioners had not appealed to the higher court within the required timeframe and no legal provision supported the relief sought. The court found the review application deserving of acceptance on merits. The petition was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case