State of Maharashtra vs Haibati alias Prakash Balwant alias Balu Patil Advocate - K. B. Desai — 16/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,323,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 14th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200001012022
e-Filing Number
08-02-2022
Filing Number
68/2022
Filing Date
05-Mar-2022
Registration No
16/2022
Registration Date
05-Mar-2022
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
212
Police Station
Shahuwadi Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Haibati alias Prakash Balwant alias Balu Patil Advocate - K. B. Desai
-
2.Laxman Ananda Patil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Haibati alias Prakash Balwant Patil & Laxman Ananda Patil Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 354(b) (outraging modesty), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (intentional insult), and 34 (common intention), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt despite the complainant's testimony and corroborating witnesses. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution presented the complainant and supporting witnesses, their testimony established only a prior dispute between the complainant's husband and the defendants, with minimal independent corroboration of the specific violent acts alleged; the prosecution failed to discharge its burden of proving the case conclusively, necessitating acquittal under the criminal procedure code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
13-Apr-2026
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
16-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
17-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
24-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
-
28-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
30-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
19-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
15-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
27-May-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
18-Mar-2024
Hearing
-
18-Jan-2024
Hearing
-
21-Nov-2023
Hearing
-
09-Oct-2023
Hearing
-
19-Aug-2023
Hearing
-
21-Jul-2023
Hearing
-
16-Jun-2023
Hearing
-
04-May-2023
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
31-Mar-2023
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
27-Mar-2023
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
02-Feb-2023
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
15-Dec-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
05-Nov-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
16-Sep-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
26-Aug-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
16-Aug-2022
ChargeView PDF
-
16-Aug-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
28-Jun-2022
Summons_Ready
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
01-Apr-2022
Summons_Ready
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
05-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2022
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Haibati alias Prakash Balwant Patil & Laxman Ananda Patil Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 354(b) (outraging modesty), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (intentional insult), and 34 (common intention), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt despite the complainant's testimony and corroborating witnesses. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution presented the complainant and supporting witnesses, their testimony established only a prior dispute between the complainant's husband and the defendants, with minimal independent corroboration of the specific violent acts alleged; the prosecution failed to discharge its burden of proving the case conclusively, necessitating acquittal under the criminal procedure code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts