State of Maharashtra vs Tukaram alias Balu Shivaji Jadhav Advocate - K. B. Desai — 13/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,143,147,149,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200000942021
Filing Number
75/2021
Filing Date
23-02-2021
Registration No
13/2021
Registration Date
23-02-2021
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
538
Police Station
Shahuwadi Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P
Respondent(s)
Tukaram alias Balu Shivaji Jadhav Advocate - K. B. Desai
Santosh Tukaram alias Balu Jadhav
Prasad Prakash Panari
Pradip Tanaji Jadhav
Rajaram Rangrao Walavekar
Vikas Aappa Walvekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all six accused of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 341, 323, 504, 506, and 149, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rioting and assault incident that occurred on December 5, 2020. The court determined that while prosecution witnesses testified to altercation between parties, their testimonies were contradictory, inconsistent, and lacked corroboration regarding the accused's specific involvement in unlawful assembly or violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted all six accused of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 341, 323, 504, 506, and 149, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rioting and assault incident that occurred on December 5, 2020. The court determined that while prosecution witnesses testified to altercation between parties, their testimonies were contradictory, inconsistent, and lacked corroboration regarding the accused's specific involvement in unlawful assembly or violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts