State of Maharashtra vs Sanjay Hindurao Kamble Advocate - Uday Balaso Vharambale — 10/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 15th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200000902024
Filing Number
68/2024
Filing Date
23-02-2024
Registration No
10/2024
Registration Date
23-02-2024
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
130
Police Station
Kale Police Station, Kale
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Hindurao Kamble Advocate - Uday Balaso Vharambale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sanjay Hindurao Kamble (Case 10/2024) The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, and 506 on May 15, 2026. While the prosecution's witnesses testified about an incident where the accused allegedly beat his wife with a bamboo stick on October 21, 2023, the court found insufficient credible evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that the prosecution's case relied heavily on related witnesses with family connections to the complainant, weakening the reliability of their testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sanjay Hindurao Kamble (Case 10/2024) The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, and 506 on May 15, 2026. While the prosecution's witnesses testified about an incident where the accused allegedly beat his wife with a bamboo stick on October 21, 2023, the court found insufficient credible evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that the prosecution's case relied heavily on related witnesses with family connections to the complainant, weakening the reliability of their testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts