State of Maharashtra vs Ashok Gajanan Walvekar — 28/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200000432025
Filing Number
37/2025
Filing Date
18-01-2025
Registration No
28/2025
Registration Date
18-01-2025
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
135
Police Station
Kale Police Station, Kale
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Ashok Gajanan Walvekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 23-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 24-11-2025 | Hearing |
| 09-09-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Ashok Gajanan Walvekar of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence that the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged that illicit liquor bottles were recovered, it noted critical gaps in the prosecution's evidence, including failure to properly identify the police vehicle used and lack of credible independent witness testimony regarding the accused's possession and intent to sell the contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Ashok Gajanan Walvekar of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence that the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged that illicit liquor bottles were recovered, it noted critical gaps in the prosecution's evidence, including failure to properly identify the police vehicle used and lack of credible independent witness testimony regarding the accused's possession and intent to sell the contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts