State of Maharashtra vs Ashok Gajanan Walvekar — 28/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200000432025
Filing Number
37/2025
Filing Date
18-Jan-2025
Registration No
28/2025
Registration Date
18-Jan-2025
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 11-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
135
Police Station
Kale Police Station, Kale
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ashok Gajanan Walvekar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Ashok Gajanan Walvekar of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence that the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged that illicit liquor bottles were recovered, it noted critical gaps in the prosecution's evidence, including failure to properly identify the police vehicle used and lack of credible independent witness testimony regarding the accused's possession and intent to sell the contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
07-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
23-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
24-Nov-2025
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
09-Sep-2025
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
10-Jun-2025
B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
28-Mar-2025
B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
20-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 28/2025
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Ashok Gajanan Walvekar of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence that the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged that illicit liquor bottles were recovered, it noted critical gaps in the prosecution's evidence, including failure to properly identify the police vehicle used and lack of credible independent witness testimony regarding the accused's possession and intent to sell the contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts