Shri Bhogeshwar Vikas Seva Sanstha Marya Bajarbhongaon Tarf Wha Chairman Balu Nana Bane vs Grampanchayat Bajar Bhogaon Tarf Gramsevak Advocate - Vishnu Bhagoji Mane — 5/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO200000332024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

10-01-2024

Filing Number

10/2024

Filing Date

10-01-2024

Registration No

5/2024

Registration Date

10-01-2024

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38,39

Petitioner(s)

Shri Bhogeshwar Vikas Seva Sanstha Marya Bajarbhongaon Tarf Wha Chairman Balu Nana Bane

Adv. Prashant H. Patil

Respondent(s)

Grampanchayat Bajar Bhogaon Tarf Gramsevak Advocate - Vishnu Bhagoji Mane

Grampanchayat Bajar Bhogaon Tarfe Sarpanch

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

06-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

23-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

19-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

22-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

23-06-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 5/2024 Outcome: The petition filed by Shri Bhogeshwar Vikas Seva Sanstha (through Chairman Balu Nana Bane) against Grampanchayat Bajar Bhogaon was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish legal ownership or standing to file the suit regarding the disputed property (Plot No. 295, Bajar Bhogaon), which is government-owned land reserved for public use. The court also noted procedural defects, including failure to properly serve notice to the Gram Panchayat as required under the Mumbai Gram Panchayat Act, 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 5/2024 Outcome: The petition filed by Shri Bhogeshwar Vikas Seva Sanstha (through Chairman Balu Nana Bane) against Grampanchayat Bajar Bhogaon was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish legal ownership or standing to file the suit regarding the disputed property (Plot No. 295, Bajar Bhogaon), which is government-owned land reserved for public use. The court also noted procedural defects, including failure to properly serve notice to the Gram Panchayat as required under the Mumbai Gram Panchayat Act, 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case