Chandu Babu Patil vs Tukaram Laxman Patil Advocate - Shahaji S. Patil — 11/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO200000262018
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
11/2018
Filing Date
29-01-2018
Registration No
11/2018
Registration Date
30-01-2018
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandu Babu Patil
Adv. Vishnu Bhagoji Mane
Sunil Ananda Patil
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Laxman Patil Advocate - Shahaji S. Patil
Nrusinh Laxman Patil
Bandu Tukaram Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 29-09-2025 | Evidence |
| 28-07-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 11/2018 Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court ordered that respondents 1-3 be directed to restore the petitioners' possession of the disputed property (Gat No. 248/2) by removing unauthorized encroachment, while the prayer for a final decree in favor of petitioners is deferred pending further proceedings. Key Issue: A boundary dispute over agricultural land where respondents allegedly encroached 3 feet into petitioners' property after a 2007 government demarcation. The court found the encroachment unlawful and ordered its removal, but directed both parties to pursue their claims on merits before the appropriate tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 11/2018 Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court ordered that respondents 1-3 be directed to restore the petitioners' possession of the disputed property (Gat No. 248/2) by removing unauthorized encroachment, while the prayer for a final decree in favor of petitioners is deferred pending further proceedings. Key Issue: A boundary dispute over agricultural land where respondents allegedly encroached 3 feet into petitioners' property after a 2007 government demarcation. The court found the encroachment unlawful and ordered its removal, but directed both parties to pursue their claims on merits before the appropriate tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts