State of Maharashtra vs Bhauso Vishnu Palange Advocate - K. B. Desai — 12/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65-E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO200000242024

Case disposed

Filing Number

20/2024

Filing Date

05-01-2024

Registration No

12/2024

Registration Date

05-01-2024

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

173

Police Station

Inspector, State Excise, Shahuwadi

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65-E

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Bhauso Vishnu Palange Advocate - K. B. Desai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

16-03-2026

Disposed

16-02-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

08-12-2025

Hearing

15-11-2025

Hearing

03-10-2025

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bhauso Vishnu Palange (Case 12/2024) The court acquitted the accused, Bhauso Vishnu Palange, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for alleged illegal possession of country liquor with intent to sell. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as critical procedural safeguards—including proper identification of the accused at the scene, documentation of the vehicle details used in the raid, and corroborating witness testimony—were inadequately proven. The court found insufficient evidence to conclusively link the accused to the seized alcohol and concluded the case lacked the necessary certainty for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bhauso Vishnu Palange (Case 12/2024) The court acquitted the accused, Bhauso Vishnu Palange, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for alleged illegal possession of country liquor with intent to sell. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as critical procedural safeguards—including proper identification of the accused at the scene, documentation of the vehicle details used in the raid, and corroborating witness testimony—were inadequately proven. The court found insufficient evidence to conclusively link the accused to the seized alcohol and concluded the case lacked the necessary certainty for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case