Arun Sakharam Chougale vs Maruti Bhau Sapkal Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil — 219/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,38. Status: Hearing Without W.S.. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190008802025

Hearing Without W.S.

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

e-Filing Number

20-12-2025

Filing Number

304/2025

Filing Date

20-12-2025

Registration No

219/2025

Registration Date

20-12-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37,38

Petitioner(s)

Arun Sakharam Chougale

Adv. S. R. Bhandigare

Ashwini Mahadev Tambekar

Adv. S. R. Bhandigare

Respondent(s)

Maruti Bhau Sapkal Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

15-04-2026

Hearing Without W.S.

10-03-2026

W.S. and Say

04-02-2026

Filing of Vakilpatra_Unready

07-01-2026

Filing of Vakilpatra_Unready

22-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

20-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: Ex-parte ad-interim injunction granted. The court restrained the defendant from carrying out construction on the suit property (Block No. 1006/A at Thikpurli, Radhanagari, Kolhapur) until the defendant files their response. The court found prima facie evidence that the property belongs to the plaintiff's deceased father through land records and photographs showing construction commencement, making the injunction necessary to protect the property's nature and preserve the suit's purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Ex-parte ad-interim injunction granted. The court restrained the defendant from carrying out construction on the suit property (Block No. 1006/A at Thikpurli, Radhanagari, Kolhapur) until the defendant files their response. The court found prima facie evidence that the property belongs to the plaintiff's deceased father through land records and photographs showing construction commencement, making the injunction necessary to protect the property's nature and preserve the suit's purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case