Arun Sakharam Chougale vs Maruti Bhau Sapkal Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil — 219/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,38. Status: Hearing Without W.S.. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Hearing Without W.S. Next hearing 06-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190008802025

e-Filing Number

20-12-2025

Filing Number

304/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

219/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arun Sakharam Chougale

    Adv. S. R. Bhandigare

  2. 2.Ashwini Mahadev Tambekar

    Adv. S. R. Bhandigare

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maruti Bhau Sapkal Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Filing of Vakilpatra_Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    Filing of Vakilpatra_Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: Ex-parte ad-interim injunction granted. The court restrained the defendant from carrying out construction on the suit property (Block No. 1006/A at Thikpurli, Radhanagari, Kolhapur) until the defendant files their response. The court found prima facie evidence that the property belongs to the plaintiff's deceased father through land records and photographs showing construction commencement, making the injunction necessary to protect the property's nature and preserve the suit's purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 219/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Ex-parte ad-interim injunction granted. The court restrained the defendant from carrying out construction on the suit property (Block No. 1006/A at Thikpurli, Radhanagari, Kolhapur) until the defendant files their response. The court found prima facie evidence that the property belongs to the plaintiff's deceased father through land records and photographs showing construction commencement, making the injunction necessary to protect the property's nature and preserve the suit's purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case