Reliable Shugar and Distalari Power Ltd Pharale thorugh Vijay Baburao Patil vs Sangram Vasant Patil Advocate - Ajit S. Patil — 253/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO190008462022

Evidence

Next Hearing

13th July 2026

Filing Number

493/2022

Filing Date

10-10-2022

Registration No

253/2022

Registration Date

10-10-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Reliable Shugar and Distalari Power Ltd Pharale thorugh Vijay Baburao Patil

Adv. D. D. Mirje

Respondent(s)

Sangram Vasant Patil Advocate - Ajit S. Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

25-05-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

19-01-2026

Evidence

17-11-2025

Evidence

29-09-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

19-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: S.C.C No. 253/2022 Outcome: The court partly allowed the complainant's application for interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused is directed to pay Rs. 12,131/- (5% of the disputed cheque amount of Rs. 2,42,619/-) to the complainant within 60 days. The court found prima facie evidence that the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds and the accused failed to make payment within the statutory 15-day period after receiving the demand notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.C No. 253/2022 Outcome: The court partly allowed the complainant's application for interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused is directed to pay Rs. 12,131/- (5% of the disputed cheque amount of Rs. 2,42,619/-) to the complainant within 60 days. The court found prima facie evidence that the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds and the accused failed to make payment within the statutory 15-day period after receiving the demand notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case