Reliable Shugar and Distalari Power Ltd Pharale thorugh Vijay Baburao Patil vs Sangram Vasant Patil Advocate - Ajit S. Patil — 253/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 13-Jul-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO190008462022

Filing Number

493/2022

Filing Date

10-Oct-2022

Registration No

253/2022

Registration Date

10-Oct-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Reliable Shugar and Distalari Power Ltd Pharale thorugh Vijay Baburao Patil

    Adv. D. D. Mirje

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sangram Vasant Patil Advocate - Ajit S. Patil

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 19-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: S.C.C No. 253/2022 Outcome: The court partly allowed the complainant's application for interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused is directed to pay Rs. 12,131/- (5% of the disputed cheque amount of Rs. 2,42,619/-) to the complainant within 60 days. The court found prima facie evidence that the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds and the accused failed to make payment within the statutory 15-day period after receiving the demand notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 10-Jul-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  11. 23-Jun-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  12. 09-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  13. 28-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 25-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  15. 14-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  16. 03-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  17. 21-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  18. 23-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  19. 16-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  20. 14-May-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  21. 26-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  22. 20-Feb-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  23. 23-Jan-2024

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  24. 10-Jan-2024

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  25. 29-Nov-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  26. 10-Oct-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  27. 25-Aug-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  28. 23-May-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  29. 28-Mar-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  30. 09-Feb-2023

    Verification

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  31. 25-Jan-2023

    Verification

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  32. 01-Dec-2022

    Verification

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  33. 22-Nov-2022

    Verification

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  34. 13-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 10-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 253/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.C No. 253/2022 Outcome: The court partly allowed the complainant's application for interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused is directed to pay Rs. 12,131/- (5% of the disputed cheque amount of Rs. 2,42,619/-) to the complainant within 60 days. The court found prima facie evidence that the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds and the accused failed to make payment within the statutory 15-day period after receiving the demand notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case