Krishnat Vithoba Sutar vs Madhukar Govind Sutar — 288/2022

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 8. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

W.S. and Say Next hearing 01-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190008332022

Filing Number

353/2022

Filing Date

06-Oct-2022

Registration No

288/2022

Registration Date

06-Oct-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Krishnat Vithoba Sutar

    Adv. R. D. Khade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Madhukar Govind Sutar

  2. 2.Satappa Nivruti Sutar

  3. 3.Smt. Ambubai Nivruti Sutar

  4. 4.Mangal Rajaram Sutar

  5. 5.Ananda Nivruti Sutar

  6. 6.Bayabai Shamrao Lohar

  7. 7.Indubai Prakash Sutar

  8. 8.Dattatraya Vithoba Sutar

  9. 9.Bhagirathi Vithoba Sutar

  10. 10.Kamal Ananda Sutar

    Adv. Ajit Shivaji Patil

  11. 11.Sulabai Kerba Sutar

  12. 12.Suman Pandurang Sutar

  13. 13.Satappa Ganapati Patil

  14. 14.Ashok Ganapati Patil

  15. 15.Asha Sarjerao Patil

  16. 16.Eknath Kondiba Patil

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary In a partition suit (R.C.S No.288/2022), the Court vacated the previous order granting defendants delay condonation to file written statements, as they failed to pay the imposed costs of Rs.300/-. The suit will now proceed without the written statements of defendant Nos.1 to 9 and 12 to 16. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 27-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 16-Dec-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 07-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 20-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 11-Jul-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 27-Jun-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  11. 16-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  12. 25-Feb-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  13. 18-Dec-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 18-Oct-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  15. 13-Sep-2024

    Steps

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  16. 14-Aug-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  17. 14-Aug-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 14-Aug-2024

    Steps

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  19. 12-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  20. 24-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  21. 13-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  22. 19-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  23. 22-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  24. 07-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  25. 09-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  26. 25-Sep-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  27. 25-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  28. 17-Jul-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  29. 05-Jun-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  30. 21-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  31. 14-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  32. 06-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  33. 09-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  34. 08-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  35. 06-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 06-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 288/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In a partition suit (R.C.S No.288/2022), the Court vacated the previous order granting defendants delay condonation to file written statements, as they failed to pay the imposed costs of Rs.300/-. The suit will now proceed without the written statements of defendant Nos.1 to 9 and 12 to 16. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case