Mhatu Govinda Kamble(Legal Heir) vs Sarjerao Ananda Kamble Advocate - R. D. Khade — 199/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 4,39,40. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190008212025
e-Filing Number
25-11-2025
Filing Number
276/2025
Filing Date
25-Nov-2025
Registration No
199/2025
Registration Date
26-Nov-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mhatu Govinda Kamble(Legal Heir)
Adv. V. S. Khorate1.
-
2.Dattatray Mahadu Kamble 1.
-
3.Janabai Mhatu Kamble 1.
-
4.Sunita Vishwas Kamble
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sarjerao Ananda Kamble Advocate - R. D. Khade
-
2.Ashwini Sanjay Kamble
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
25-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
12-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
27-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
26-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary - R.C.S. No. 199/2025 The court granted an ex parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs (Mhatu Govinda Kamble and legal heirs) against Defendant No. 1 (Sarjerao Ananda Kamble). The plaintiffs, who established lawful ownership through a 1996 registered sale deed and 7/12 land extract, sought to restrain the defendant from continuing construction on their property in Mhasurli, Kolhapur. The court found prima facie evidence supporting the plaintiffs' ownership and approved the injunction, restraining further construction until the defendant files his response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 199/2025
Case Summary - R.C.S. No. 199/2025 The court granted an ex parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs (Mhatu Govinda Kamble and legal heirs) against Defendant No. 1 (Sarjerao Ananda Kamble). The plaintiffs, who established lawful ownership through a 1996 registered sale deed and 7/12 land extract, sought to restrain the defendant from continuing construction on their property in Mhasurli, Kolhapur. The court found prima facie evidence supporting the plaintiffs' ownership and approved the injunction, restraining further construction until the defendant files his response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts