Prahlad Baburao Dhawan vs Eknath Atmaram Dhawan Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil — 195/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190008182025
Next Hearing
04th August 2026
e-Filing Number
24-11-2025
Filing Number
273/2025
Filing Date
25-11-2025
Registration No
195/2025
Registration Date
26-11-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prahlad Baburao Dhawan
Adv. S. P. Wagvekar
Ramesh Baburao Dhawan
Adv. S. P. Wagvekar
Suresh Baburao Dhawan
Adv. S. P. Wagvekar
Respondent(s)
Eknath Atmaram Dhawan Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Issues
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Issues |
| 23-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 15-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 08-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs (Prahlad Baburao Dhawan) restraining the defendants from obstructing their peaceful possession of agricultural land (Block Nos. 502 and 503) at Naratawade, Kolhapur, or damaging crops therein until final disposal of the suit. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on revenue records in their names, the balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable injury from loss of standing crops if the injunction were refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs (Prahlad Baburao Dhawan) restraining the defendants from obstructing their peaceful possession of agricultural land (Block Nos. 502 and 503) at Naratawade, Kolhapur, or damaging crops therein until final disposal of the suit. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on revenue records in their names, the balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable injury from loss of standing crops if the injunction were refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts