Ajit Aaba Patil vs Sanjay Mahadev Dakare Advocate - V. T. Dhanawade — 291/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190007802023
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
08-12-2023
Filing Number
372/2023
Filing Date
08-12-2023
Registration No
291/2023
Registration Date
08-12-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajit Aaba Patil
Adv. Ajit Shivaji Patil
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Mahadev Dakare Advocate - V. T. Dhanawade
Keshav Aaba Patil
Akshay Ajit Patil
Sangita Ajit Patil
Dilip Aaba Patil
Viswajeet Vilas Patil
Nisha Sourabha Patil
Bharati Vilas Patil
Vilas Aaba Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 27-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 14-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: R.C.S. 291 of 2023 (Ajit Aaba Patil Vs Sanjay Mahadev Dakare) Outcome: Application Rejected The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to disclose the nature of the alleged formal defect in their application, as mandated under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Without identifying a specific formal defect or sufficient grounds justifying withdrawal, the court was not satisfied to grant the requested relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: R.C.S. 291 of 2023 (Ajit Aaba Patil Vs Sanjay Mahadev Dakare) Outcome: Application Rejected The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to disclose the nature of the alleged formal defect in their application, as mandated under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Without identifying a specific formal defect or sufficient grounds justifying withdrawal, the court was not satisfied to grant the requested relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts