Krushna Tukaram Parakhe vs Uttam Bhauso Taralekar — 296/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Awaiting Summons Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO190007732025

e-Filing Number

08-11-2025

Filing Number

527/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

296/2025

Registration Date

11-Nov-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Krushna Tukaram Parakhe

    Adv. V. M. Khade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttam Bhauso Taralekar

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 296/2025 Summary: The court found prima-facie evidence that the accused issued a cheque of Rs. 5,33,000 that was dishonoured due to signature mismatch, and failed to pay despite receiving a demand notice. The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and directed summons to be issued accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 05-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 296/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 296/2025 Summary: The court found prima-facie evidence that the accused issued a cheque of Rs. 5,33,000 that was dishonoured due to signature mismatch, and failed to pay despite receiving a demand notice. The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and directed summons to be issued accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case