State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Amol Balaso Aadke Advocate - A. S. Huparikar — 286/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,184,134(A)(B). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO190007652019

Filing Number

532/2019

Filing Date

02-Dec-2019

Registration No

286/2019

Registration Date

02-Dec-2019

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Decision Date

18-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0103

Police Station

Radhanagari Polilce Station

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,184,134(A)(B)
Motor Vehicles Act Section 184,134(a)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amol Balaso Aadke Advocate - A. S. Huparikar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 18-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 286/2019 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Radhanagari acquitted defendant Amol Balaso Aadke of all charges on May 18, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the accusations that the accused recklessly or negligently drove his vehicle (MH-04-DJ-2219) on March 12, 2019, striking a child named Rudra on the back and causing serious injuries. The three prosecution witnesses could not substantiate the charges under Indian Penal Code sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 184, 134(a)(b), so the accused was granted acquittal under CrPC section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-May-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 11-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 04-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 13-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  11. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  12. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  15. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  16. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  17. 27-May-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  18. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  19. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  20. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  21. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  22. 14-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  23. 28-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  24. 22-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  25. 27-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  26. 06-May-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  27. 18-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  28. 05-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  29. 20-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  30. 02-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  31. 06-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  32. 24-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  33. 19-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  34. 25-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  35. 06-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  36. 12-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  37. 04-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  38. 16-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  39. 22-Jun-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  40. 08-Apr-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  41. 14-Feb-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  42. 04-Jan-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  43. 23-Nov-2021

    Plea / Particulars

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  44. 25-Oct-2021

    Plea / Particulars

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  45. 24-Sep-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  46. 06-Aug-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  47. 02-Jun-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  48. 03-Apr-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  49. 05-Feb-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  50. 02-Dec-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  51. 22-Sep-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  52. 21-Jul-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  53. 08-Jun-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  54. 30-Mar-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  55. 20-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  56. 16-Jan-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  57. 02-Dec-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 02-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 286/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 286/2019 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Radhanagari acquitted defendant Amol Balaso Aadke of all charges on May 18, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the accusations that the accused recklessly or negligently drove his vehicle (MH-04-DJ-2219) on March 12, 2019, striking a child named Rudra on the back and causing serious injuries. The three prosecution witnesses could not substantiate the charges under Indian Penal Code sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 184, 134(a)(b), so the accused was granted acquittal under CrPC section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case