Ashok Ramchandra Patil vs Dilip Ramacharda Patil and other — 264/2023

Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 07-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190007202023

e-Filing Number

09-11-2023

Filing Number

340/2023

Filing Date

10-Nov-2023

Registration No

264/2023

Registration Date

21-Nov-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Ramchandra Patil

    Adv. Dhananjay A. Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dilip Ramacharda Patil and other

  2. 2.Sanjay Ramchandra Patil

    Adv. B. A. Wagare-MAH/4917/

  3. 3.Dropadi Ramchandra Patil

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 13-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 07-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 19-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 08-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 20-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  11. 21-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  12. 25-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The application filed by defendants for delay condonation in filing their Written Statement (W.S) has been allowed. The "No W.S" order previously passed against the defendants is set aside, as the court found that proceeding without their W.S would prejudice their valuable rights in the immovable property dispute. The defendants are ordered to pay costs of Rs. 100/- to the plaintiff on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 25-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 04-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  15. 03-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  16. 26-Nov-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  17. 01-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  18. 10-Sep-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  19. 23-Jul-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  20. 18-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  21. 02-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  22. 19-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  23. 01-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  24. 27-Feb-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  25. 06-Feb-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  26. 16-Jan-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  27. 02-Jan-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  28. 26-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  29. 22-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  30. 05-Dec-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  31. 24-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 10-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 264/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by defendants for delay condonation in filing their Written Statement (W.S) has been allowed. The "No W.S" order previously passed against the defendants is set aside, as the court found that proceeding without their W.S would prejudice their valuable rights in the immovable property dispute. The defendants are ordered to pay costs of Rs. 100/- to the plaintiff on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case