Shri. Bandopant Maruti Kumbhar vs Shri. Pandurang Maruti Kumbhar etc. 10 Advocate - D. M. Potdar — 1600145/2016
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190007072016
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
160211/2016
Filing Date
11-11-2016
Registration No
1600145/2016
Registration Date
05-12-2016
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Bandopant Maruti Kumbhar
Adv. A. M. Patil
Respondent(s)
Shri. Pandurang Maruti Kumbhar etc. 10 Advocate - D. M. Potdar
Shri.Krushnat Maruti Kumbhar
Adv. B. P. Patil
Shri.Shankar Maruti Kumbhar
Adv. B. P. Patil
Shri.Babaji Bhau Kumbhar
Adv. B. P. Patil
Shri.Dinkar Bhau Kumbhar
Adv. B. P. Patil
Shri. Dhondiram Abaji Kumbhar
Adv. B. P. Patil
Shri.Nathaji Abaji Kumbhar
Adv. B. P. Patil
Shri.Dhanaji Babaji Kumbhar
Adv. B. P. Patil
Shri. Vitthal Shankar Kumbhar
Adv. B. P. Patil
Shri.Dagdu Sakharam Kumbhar
Adv. B. P. Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 19-12-2025 | Arguments |
| 11-11-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this ancestral property dispute (R.C.S. No. 145/2016), the court allowed Defendant No. 1's application to set aside the "no cross" orders passed against him, granting him an opportunity to adduce evidence and conduct cross-examination. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,500, finding that Defendant No. 1's prolonged absence since 2023 demonstrated inappropriate conduct, though natural justice principles warranted allowing him to present his case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this ancestral property dispute (R.C.S. No. 145/2016), the court allowed Defendant No. 1's application to set aside the "no cross" orders passed against him, granting him an opportunity to adduce evidence and conduct cross-examination. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,500, finding that Defendant No. 1's prolonged absence since 2023 demonstrated inappropriate conduct, though natural justice principles warranted allowing him to present his case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts