State of Maharashtra thr. State Excise Radhanagari vs Dattatraya Rangrao Powar Advocate - U. M. Mankar — 202/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190006922022
Filing Number
402/2022
Filing Date
18-Aug-2022
Registration No
202/2022
Registration Date
18-Aug-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
117
Police Station
State Exice office, Radhanagari No.2
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra thr. State Excise Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dattatraya Rangrao Powar Advocate - U. M. Mankar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court acquitted defendant Dattatraya Rangrao Powar of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling prohibited alcohol. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized bottles were actually prohibited liquor or that the defendant possessed them for sale, as the chemical analysis report was not properly authenticated and prosecution witnesses provided inconsistent testimony. The defendant was acquitted under CrPC Section 255(1) and ordered to be released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Feb-2026
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Jan-2026
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
03-Jan-2026
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
24-Nov-2025
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
11-Nov-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
30-Oct-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
03-Jul-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
07-May-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
15-Mar-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Jul-2024
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Apr-2024
Hearing
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
29-Feb-2024
Hearing
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
06-Dec-2023
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
07-Oct-2023
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
02-Aug-2023
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Jun-2023
Awaiting Summons
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Apr-2023
Awaiting Summons
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Feb-2023
Awaiting Summons
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
08-Nov-2022
Awaiting Summons
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
22-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 202/2022
The court acquitted defendant Dattatraya Rangrao Powar of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling prohibited alcohol. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized bottles were actually prohibited liquor or that the defendant possessed them for sale, as the chemical analysis report was not properly authenticated and prosecution witnesses provided inconsistent testimony. The defendant was acquitted under CrPC Section 255(1) and ordered to be released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts