State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Shakil Dadu Mullani etc. 4 Advocate - Umesh D. Patil — 192/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190005852020
Filing Number
392/2020
Filing Date
25-Nov-2020
Registration No
192/2020
Registration Date
25-Nov-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0213
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shakil Dadu Mullani etc. 4 Advocate - Umesh D. Patil
-
2.Ramdas Dinkar Shinde
Adv. Umesh D. Patil
-
3.Vilas Pandurang Murgude
Adv. Umesh D. Patil
-
4.Chandrakant Dinkar Shinde
Adv. Umesh D. Patil
Case History
-
15-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Mar-2026
PleaView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 192/2020 On 20/10/2020, four accused were found playing teen patti (an illegal gambling game) at a farm in Sainagar, Radhanagari taluk, Kolhapur district, in violation of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Radhanagari, on 16/03/2026, accused No. 1 (Shakil Dadu Mullani), No. 3 (Vilas Pandurang Murgude), and No. 4 (Chandrakant Dinkar Shinde) each pleaded not guilty to the charges, while accused No. 2 (Ramdas Dinkar Shinde) was deceased. The case proceeded to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
27-Jan-2026
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Nov-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
27-Oct-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
08-Sep-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
23-Jul-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Apr-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
11-Feb-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Dec-2024
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
09-Oct-2024
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
29-Aug-2024
B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Jul-2024
B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Apr-2024
B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
09-Jan-2024
B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
08-Nov-2023
B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Sep-2023
B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
03-Aug-2023
B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Jun-2023
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
27-Apr-2023
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Apr-2023
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Dec-2022
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
10-Oct-2022
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
03-Aug-2022
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-May-2022
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
14-Mar-2022
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Jan-2022
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
23-Nov-2021
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
22-Sep-2021
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
14-Jul-2021
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
23-Apr-2021
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
24-Feb-2021
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
25-Nov-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Nov-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 192/2020
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 192/2020 On 20/10/2020, four accused were found playing teen patti (an illegal gambling game) at a farm in Sainagar, Radhanagari taluk, Kolhapur district, in violation of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Radhanagari, on 16/03/2026, accused No. 1 (Shakil Dadu Mullani), No. 3 (Vilas Pandurang Murgude), and No. 4 (Chandrakant Dinkar Shinde) each pleaded not guilty to the charges, while accused No. 2 (Ramdas Dinkar Shinde) was deceased. The case proceeded to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts