State of Maharashtra thr Pl.St.Radhanagari vs Vikram Gopal Patil Advocate - A. S. Huparikar — 1600172/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 21st May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190005712016
Filing Number
1600405/2016
Filing Date
26-09-2016
Registration No
1600172/2016
Registration Date
26-09-2016
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
21st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
59
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr Pl.St.Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Vikram Gopal Patil Advocate - A. S. Huparikar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 04-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 20-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 16-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Gopal Patil Case Number: 1600172/2016 Decision Date: 21 May 2026 The court acquitted defendant Vikram Gopal Patil of all charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, 427 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 184, 134(a)(b). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly operated his tractor (MH09BP3942) causing a collision with a motorcycle on 2 February 2016, injuring two persons and damaging the vehicle. Despite eyewitness testimony, the prosecution presented insufficient evidence establishing the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Gopal Patil Case Number: 1600172/2016 Decision Date: 21 May 2026 The court acquitted defendant Vikram Gopal Patil of all charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, 427 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 184, 134(a)(b). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly operated his tractor (MH09BP3942) causing a collision with a motorcycle on 2 February 2016, injuring two persons and damaging the vehicle. Despite eyewitness testimony, the prosecution presented insufficient evidence establishing the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts