State of Maharashtra thr Pl.St.Radhanagari vs Vikram Gopal Patil Advocate - A. S. Huparikar — 1600172/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 21st May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO190005712016

Filing Number

1600405/2016

Filing Date

26-Sep-2016

Registration No

1600172/2016

Registration Date

26-Sep-2016

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Decision Date

21-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

59

Police Station

Radhanagari Polilce Station

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,427
Motor Vehicles Act Section 184,134(a)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra thr Pl.St.Radhanagari

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vikram Gopal Patil Advocate - A. S. Huparikar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 21-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Gopal Patil Case Number: 1600172/2016 Decision Date: 21 May 2026 The court acquitted defendant Vikram Gopal Patil of all charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, 427 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 184, 134(a)(b). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly operated his tractor (MH09BP3942) causing a collision with a motorcycle on 2 February 2016, injuring two persons and damaging the vehicle. Despite eyewitness testimony, the prosecution presented insufficient evidence establishing the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-May-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 18-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 04-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  11. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  12. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  13. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  15. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  16. 05-May-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  17. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  18. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  19. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  20. 16-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  21. 04-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  22. 23-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  23. 27-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  24. 26-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  25. 05-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  26. 28-May-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  27. 29-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  28. 27-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  29. 27-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  30. 22-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  31. 18-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  32. 21-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  33. 27-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  34. 21-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  35. 10-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  36. 12-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  37. 18-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  38. 08-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  39. 24-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  40. 07-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  41. 17-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  42. 13-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  43. 25-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  44. 29-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  45. 23-May-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  46. 11-Apr-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  47. 12-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  48. 07-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  49. 20-Dec-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  50. 12-Nov-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  51. 14-Sep-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  52. 06-Jul-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  53. 17-May-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  54. 23-Mar-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  55. 22-Feb-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  56. 22-Dec-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  57. 20-Oct-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  58. 14-Aug-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  59. 25-Jun-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  60. 19-May-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  61. 16-Mar-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  62. 17-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  63. 13-Jan-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  64. 30-Dec-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  65. 02-Dec-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  66. 11-Nov-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  67. 07-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  68. 16-Sep-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  69. 05-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  70. 01-Jul-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  71. 27-May-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  72. 06-May-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  73. 15-Apr-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  74. 11-Mar-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  75. 14-Jan-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  76. 26-Nov-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  77. 08-Oct-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  78. 10-Sep-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  79. 30-Jul-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  80. 02-Jul-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  81. 07-May-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  82. 19-Mar-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  83. 12-Feb-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  84. 08-Jan-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  85. 20-Nov-2017

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  86. 09-Oct-2017

    Charge

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  87. 28-Aug-2017

    Charge

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  88. 17-Jul-2017

    Charge

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  89. 22-May-2017

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  90. 09-Mar-2017

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  91. 06-Feb-2017

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  92. 23-Dec-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  93. 26-Sep-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1600172/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Gopal Patil Case Number: 1600172/2016 Decision Date: 21 May 2026 The court acquitted defendant Vikram Gopal Patil of all charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, 427 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 184, 134(a)(b). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly operated his tractor (MH09BP3942) causing a collision with a motorcycle on 2 February 2016, injuring two persons and damaging the vehicle. Despite eyewitness testimony, the prosecution presented insufficient evidence establishing the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case