Manas Deepak Aadake vs Deepak Baburao Aadake Advocate - S. P. Wagvekar — 145/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,36. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190005632025

e-Filing Number

13-08-2025

Filing Number

194/2025

Filing Date

13-Aug-2025

Registration No

145/2025

Registration Date

13-Aug-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,36

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manas Deepak Aadake

    Adv. S. T. Desai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deepak Baburao Aadake Advocate - S. P. Wagvekar

  2. 2.Rekha Deepak Adke

  3. 3.Manshi Sanket Keripale

  4. 4.The Azra Urban Co OP BANK LT sick

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected Defendant No. 9's (a Multi-State Co-operative Society) application seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on grounds of statutory bars under the SARFAESI Act and MSCS Act. The court held that since the suit's primary relief is partition of ancestral property—a civil remedy beyond the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal—the civil court retains jurisdiction and the suit is maintainable. The court also found that the mandatory notice requirement under Section 115 of the MSCS Act applies only to suits directly touching the society's business, which this partition suit does not. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 16-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 15-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 18-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  11. 29-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  12. 10-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  13. 03-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 19-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 13-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 145/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected Defendant No. 9's (a Multi-State Co-operative Society) application seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on grounds of statutory bars under the SARFAESI Act and MSCS Act. The court held that since the suit's primary relief is partition of ancestral property—a civil remedy beyond the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal—the civil court retains jurisdiction and the suit is maintainable. The court also found that the mandatory notice requirement under Section 115 of the MSCS Act applies only to suits directly touching the society's business, which this partition suit does not. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case