Sitaram Dattatray Patil etc.2 vs Vilas Dattatray Patil etc.6 Advocate - S. P. Wagvekar — 137/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190004862021

Steps

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

137/2021

Filing Date

18-09-2021

Registration No

137/2021

Registration Date

18-09-2021

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 9
Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Sitaram Dattatray Patil etc.2

Adv. B. M. Ghorpade

Digambar Sitaram Patil

Adv. B. M. Ghorpade

Respondent(s)

Vilas Dattatray Patil etc.6 Advocate - S. P. Wagvekar

Draupadi Vilas Patil

Hindurao Dattatray Patil

Ranjana Ramchandra Dhobale Patil

Sonabai Shankar Patil

Jijabai Shamrao Bawaskar deceased(Legal Heir)

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

10-03-2026

Steps

23-01-2026

Steps

16-12-2025

Steps

29-10-2025

Steps

23-09-2025

Steps

Interim Orders

02-08-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to add parties to the partition and permanent injunction suit under CPC Order I Rule 10. The plaintiffs omitted legal heirs of defendant No. 6, children of defendants No. 1 and 2, and the wife and children of defendant No. 3 due to lack of information. The court found the addition justified given the nature of the suit and directed plaintiffs to amend the plaint by the next date with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to add parties to the partition and permanent injunction suit under CPC Order I Rule 10. The plaintiffs omitted legal heirs of defendant No. 6, children of defendants No. 1 and 2, and the wife and children of defendant No. 3 due to lack of information. The court found the addition justified given the nature of the suit and directed plaintiffs to amend the plaint by the next date with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case