Tukaram Ganu Patil vs Shrimati Laxmibai Sakharam Patil etc. 9 Advocate - G. K. Wagare — 1600220/2012
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190004662009
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
1602071/2009
Filing Date
02-09-2009
Registration No
1600220/2012
Registration Date
14-09-2009
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tukaram Ganu Patil
Adv. Avinash Balkrishna Raibagkar
Respondent(s)
Shrimati Laxmibai Sakharam Patil etc. 9 Advocate - G. K. Wagare
Rajendra Sakharam Patil.
Adv. G. K. Wagare
Sou.Mina Rajendra Patil.
Adv. G. K. Wagare
Sou.Jyoti Dipak Mhetar.
Adv. G. K. Wagare
Pushpa Sunil Patil.
Adv. P. S. Mankar
Ashvini Vijayrao Bhosale
Adv. P. S. Mankar
Shri. Rohit Sunil Patil
Adv. Ex- Parte
Reshama Sunil Patil
Adv. P. S. Mankar
Devyani Sunil Patil
Adv. P. S. Mankar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Tukaram Ganu Patil v. Shrimati Laxmibai Sakharam Patil (R.C.S. No. 220/2012) The court allowed both applications filed by the plaintiff for permission to re-examine himself and to set aside the "no-re-examination" remark. The plaintiff, in a partition suit, had denied his signatures on the first vakalatnama and plaint during cross-examination due to confusion arising from a paralysis attack and multiple vakalatnama filings with different signatures. The court found legitimate grounds for re-examination and ruled that no prejudice would result to defendants, who retain the right to cross-examine again. The order was passed on 18/04/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Tukaram Ganu Patil v. Shrimati Laxmibai Sakharam Patil (R.C.S. No. 220/2012) The court allowed both applications filed by the plaintiff for permission to re-examine himself and to set aside the "no-re-examination" remark. The plaintiff, in a partition suit, had denied his signatures on the first vakalatnama and plaint during cross-examination due to confusion arising from a paralysis attack and multiple vakalatnama filings with different signatures. The court found legitimate grounds for re-examination and ruled that no prejudice would result to defendants, who retain the right to cross-examine again. The order was passed on 18/04/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts