State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Vijay Balwant Kesarkar Advocate - R. D. Patil — 193/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190004652025
Filing Number
308/2025
Filing Date
10-Jul-2025
Registration No
193/2025
Registration Date
11-Jul-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 11-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vijay Balwant Kesarkar Advocate - R. D. Patil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged accused Vijay Balwant Kesarkar from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was ordered because the prosecution failed to file the mandatory chemical analyzer report despite the case being registered in 2025, and the accused remained absent from court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Feb-2026
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
18-Dec-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Oct-2025
Filing of Surety
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 193/2025
The court discharged accused Vijay Balwant Kesarkar from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was ordered because the prosecution failed to file the mandatory chemical analyzer report despite the case being registered in 2025, and the accused remained absent from court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts