State of Maharashtra thr. Exice office Kagal - 2 vs Sagar Baban Patole Advocate - U. M. Mankar — 189/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),98. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO190004562025

Filing Number

299/2025

Filing Date

08-Jul-2025

Registration No

189/2025

Registration Date

09-Jul-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 11-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

92

Police Station

State excise Kagal

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),98

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra thr. Exice office Kagal - 2

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sagar Baban Patole Advocate - U. M. Mankar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Sagar Baban Patole from charges under Sections 65(e) and 98 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and stopped the proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was ordered because the prosecution failed to file the essential chemical analyzer report despite the offense being registered in 2025, and the accused's non-appearance could not be addressed without this critical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Filing of Surety

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 26-Dec-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 16-Oct-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 16-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 08-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 189/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Sagar Baban Patole from charges under Sections 65(e) and 98 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and stopped the proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was ordered because the prosecution failed to file the essential chemical analyzer report despite the offense being registered in 2025, and the accused's non-appearance could not be addressed without this critical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case