The State of Maharashtra vs Shri. Krishna Aba Jadhav Advocate - S. P. Wagvekar — 1600067/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,337,324,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190004122014
Filing Number
1600265/2014
Filing Date
02-09-2014
Registration No
1600067/2014
Registration Date
02-09-2014
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Shri. Krishna Aba Jadhav Advocate - S. P. Wagvekar
Shri. Dattatrya Krishna Jadhav
Adv. Sandeep Pandurang Wagavekar
Sou. Gourabai Krishna Jadhav
Adv. Sandeep Pandurang Wagavekar
Shrimati Sajabai alies Bharati Rajendra Magdum
Adv. Sandeep Pandurang Wagavekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 1600067/2014 The court acquitted all three accused (Krushna Aba Jadhav, Dattatraya Krushna Jadhav, and Sajabai Rajendra Magdum) of charges under IPC sections 452, 337, 324, 323, 504, and 506 due to inconsistencies and material improvements in prosecution witness testimony, lack of corroboration from medical and seizure evidence, and the existence of a civil land dispute between parties that motivated potential false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 1600067/2014 The court acquitted all three accused (Krushna Aba Jadhav, Dattatraya Krushna Jadhav, and Sajabai Rajendra Magdum) of charges under IPC sections 452, 337, 324, 323, 504, and 506 due to inconsistencies and material improvements in prosecution witness testimony, lack of corroboration from medical and seizure evidence, and the existence of a civil land dispute between parties that motivated potential false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts