State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Nivrutti Krishna Patil Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil — 79/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 08-Jul-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO190004032023

Filing Number

196/2023

Filing Date

01-Jul-2023

Registration No

79/2023

Registration Date

01-Jul-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

Radhanagari Polilce Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338
Motor Vehicles Act Section 134(a)9b),5/180,3(1)/181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nivrutti Krishna Patil Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil

  2. 2.Aslam Balaso Mullani

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: 79/2023 This is a criminal case concerning an accident investigation. A witness (Ananda Nana Joshi, aged 43, a farmer) testified regarding an accident that occurred on March 22, 2023, on the Tarle-Durgumanwad road in Radhanagari, Kolhapur district. The witness confirmed police conduct of an on-site panchanama (formal inspection record) at approximately 11:15 AM, which lasted until 12:30 PM, and validated the accuracy of the documented findings and photographs. During cross-examination by the defense counsel, the witness's testimony regarding his relationship to other parties and the procedural details of the investigation was tested. The court accepted the witness's testimony in full. The case proceedings continued with examination complete and no further cross-examination required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  10. 21-Nov-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  11. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  12. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  13. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  15. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  16. 18-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  17. 31-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  18. 03-Dec-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  19. 23-Oct-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  20. 20-Sep-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  21. 16-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  22. 13-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  23. 29-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  24. 26-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  25. 24-Nov-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  26. 05-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  27. 05-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 01-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 79/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 79/2023 This is a criminal case concerning an accident investigation. A witness (Ananda Nana Joshi, aged 43, a farmer) testified regarding an accident that occurred on March 22, 2023, on the Tarle-Durgumanwad road in Radhanagari, Kolhapur district. The witness confirmed police conduct of an on-site panchanama (formal inspection record) at approximately 11:15 AM, which lasted until 12:30 PM, and validated the accuracy of the documented findings and photographs. During cross-examination by the defense counsel, the witness's testimony regarding his relationship to other parties and the procedural details of the investigation was tested. The court accepted the witness's testimony in full. The case proceedings continued with examination complete and no further cross-examination required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case