Indubai Krushna Patil vs Balwant Krushna Patil Advocate - Suresh K. Patil — 101/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

Issues Next hearing 29-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190003782025

e-Filing Number

30-05-2025

Filing Number

131/2025

Filing Date

30-May-2025

Registration No

101/2025

Registration Date

30-May-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Indubai Krushna Patil

    Adv. D. M. Potdar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balwant Krushna Patil Advocate - Suresh K. Patil

Case History

  1. 29-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 101/2025 The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiff Indubai Krushna Patil. Defendants (her son Balwant and his wife) are restrained from obstructing her possession of four properties—Blocks 20, 22, 319, and Grampanchayat Property 184—until final disposal of the suit. The plaintiff claims these are self-acquired properties purchased with gifts from her husband, while disputing a 2012 partition deed as fraudulently obtained. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and risk of irreparable injury if restraint was denied, without determining ultimate ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Issues

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  11. 07-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  12. 24-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 24-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 05-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  15. 05-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  16. 07-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  17. 18-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  18. 09-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  19. 11-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  20. 30-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 30-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 101/2025 The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiff Indubai Krushna Patil. Defendants (her son Balwant and his wife) are restrained from obstructing her possession of four properties—Blocks 20, 22, 319, and Grampanchayat Property 184—until final disposal of the suit. The plaintiff claims these are self-acquired properties purchased with gifts from her husband, while disputing a 2012 partition deed as fraudulently obtained. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and risk of irreparable injury if restraint was denied, without determining ultimate ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case