Shripatrao Govind Killedar vs Dinkar Ganapati Killedar Deceased Advocate - Ajit Shivaji Patil — 135/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190003482023
Filing Number
184/2023
Filing Date
31-May-2023
Registration No
135/2023
Registration Date
31-May-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shripatrao Govind Killedar
Adv. J. P. Lad
-
2.Mahipati Govind Killedar Deceased(Legal Heir)
Adv. Ajit Shivaji Patil2.
-
3.Anil Mahipati Killedar(Legal Heir)
Adv. Ajit Shivaji Patil2.
-
4.Sunil Mahipati Killedar
Adv. Ajit Shivaji Patil2.
-
5.Shashikala Navnath Patil
Adv. Ajit Shivaji Patil2.
-
6.Indumati Shivaji Patil
Adv. Ajit Shivaji Patil2.
-
7.Ratnabai Mahipati Killedar
Adv. Ajit Shivaji Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dinkar Ganapati Killedar Deceased Advocate - Ajit Shivaji Patil
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
10-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
15-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
26-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
10-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
08-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The application for amendment/correction (Nishaani No. 26) filed by the plaintiff in Civil Suit No. 135/2023 is allowed/granted. The defendant is directed to file a corrected affidavit incorporating the permitted amendments within the next hearing date. The court found the proposed amendments necessary for clarifying the plaintiff's claim and ordered the defendant's objection application to be dismissed as it was filed merely to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
08-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
07-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
06-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
22-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
12-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
12-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
03-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
26-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
12-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
15-Dec-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
07-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
03-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Sep-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
10-Aug-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Jul-2023
W.S. and Say
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 135/2023
The application for amendment/correction (Nishaani No. 26) filed by the plaintiff in Civil Suit No. 135/2023 is allowed/granted. The defendant is directed to file a corrected affidavit incorporating the permitted amendments within the next hearing date. The court found the proposed amendments necessary for clarifying the plaintiff's claim and ordered the defendant's objection application to be dismissed as it was filed merely to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts