Bajirao Maruti More vs Pandurang Shivaji Powar Advocate - S. P. Wagvekar — 100/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,39. Status: Hearing Without W.S.. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190003372025

Hearing Without W.S.

Next Hearing

17th July 2026

e-Filing Number

17-05-2025

Filing Number

130/2025

Filing Date

19-05-2025

Registration No

100/2025

Registration Date

19-05-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,39

Petitioner(s)

Bajirao Maruti More

Adv. A. S. Jadhav

Respondent(s)

Pandurang Shivaji Powar Advocate - S. P. Wagvekar

Saravade Vyapari Association Co op Credit Society Limited Saravade

Adv. V. S. Khorate

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

12-06-2026

Hearing Without W.S.

09-04-2026

W.S. and Say

16-03-2026

W.S. and Say

12-01-2026

W.S. and Say

12-11-2025

W.S. and Say

Interim Orders

09-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 100/2025 Outcome: The petition (Application No. 17) filed by Bajirao Maruti More was ALLOWED/GRANTED. The court rejected Respondent No. 2 (Saravade Vyapari Association Co-op Credit Society Limited)'s contention that the case was outside the court's jurisdiction. The court held that despite the credit society's claim that disputes involving it should be resolved under the Cooperative Societies Act through a separate judicial mechanism, the present dispute—involving allegations that Respondent No. 1 unlawfully pledged the petitioner's daughter's gold bracelet with the credit society—relates to the society's business operations and falls within the civil court's jurisdiction. Accordingly, the civil suit is maintainable before this court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100/2025 Outcome: The petition (Application No. 17) filed by Bajirao Maruti More was ALLOWED/GRANTED. The court rejected Respondent No. 2 (Saravade Vyapari Association Co-op Credit Society Limited)'s contention that the case was outside the court's jurisdiction. The court held that despite the credit society's claim that disputes involving it should be resolved under the Cooperative Societies Act through a separate judicial mechanism, the present dispute—involving allegations that Respondent No. 1 unlawfully pledged the petitioner's daughter's gold bracelet with the credit society—relates to the society's business operations and falls within the civil court's jurisdiction. Accordingly, the civil suit is maintainable before this court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case