Nasruddin Babalal Mulla vs Anwar Imam Mullani etc. — 58/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,36. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190003042019
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
82/2019
Filing Date
30-04-2019
Registration No
58/2019
Registration Date
02-05-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nasruddin Babalal Mulla
Adv. shinde santosh ganpati
Respondent(s)
Anwar Imam Mullani etc.
Khushaahmad Anwar Mullani
Iqbal Anwar Mullani
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 23-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary R.C.S. No. 58/2019 (Nasruddin Babalal Mulla Vs Anwar Imam Mullani) - Petition Allowed The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to correct a typographical error (document No. 220/2018 should be 220/2012). The court found the amendment would not change the suit's nature, prejudice the defendants, or affect trial (not yet commenced), and was necessitated by clerical error. The plaintiff must execute the amendments before the next date with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary R.C.S. No. 58/2019 (Nasruddin Babalal Mulla Vs Anwar Imam Mullani) - Petition Allowed The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to correct a typographical error (document No. 220/2018 should be 220/2012). The court found the amendment would not change the suit's nature, prejudice the defendants, or affect trial (not yet commenced), and was necessitated by clerical error. The plaintiff must execute the amendments before the next date with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts