Sanjay Govind Ghatage, etc.6 vs Pandurang Shamrao Ghatage, etc.6 Advocate - Ajit S. Patil — 115/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190002722022
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
137/2022
Filing Date
04-04-2022
Registration No
115/2022
Registration Date
04-04-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Govind Ghatage, etc.6
Adv. D. M. Potdar
Santosh Gavind Ghatage
Tanaji Hindurao Ghatage
Prakash Hindurao Ghatage
Vinayak Shankar Ghatage
Sunil Shankar Ghatage
Anil Shankar Ghatage
Respondent(s)
Pandurang Shamrao Ghatage, etc.6 Advocate - Ajit S. Patil
Prakash Shamrao Ghatage
Maruti Shamrao Ghatage
Sadashiv Vishnu Ghatage
Ashok Pandurang Ghatage
Dilip Pandurang Ghatage
Suresh Pandurang Ghatage
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 26-09-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by Defendant Nos. 1 and 4 to set aside the ex-parte order dated 08/06/2022 in a property partition suit has been allowed. The court set aside the ex-parte order against these defendants, recognizing that proceeding without their evidence would prejudice their rights in the immovable property dispute. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 2,000 each on the defendants for unjustifiable delay in filing the application, with Rs. 2,000 to be paid to the plaintiffs and Rs. 2,000 to T.L.S.C. Radhanagari. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by Defendant Nos. 1 and 4 to set aside the ex-parte order dated 08/06/2022 in a property partition suit has been allowed. The court set aside the ex-parte order against these defendants, recognizing that proceeding without their evidence would prejudice their rights in the immovable property dispute. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 2,000 each on the defendants for unjustifiable delay in filing the application, with Rs. 2,000 to be paid to the plaintiffs and Rs. 2,000 to T.L.S.C. Radhanagari. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts