Sanjay Govind Ghatage, etc.6 vs Pandurang Shamrao Ghatage, etc.6 Advocate - Ajit S. Patil — 115/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190002722022

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

03rd July 2026

Filing Number

137/2022

Filing Date

04-04-2022

Registration No

115/2022

Registration Date

04-04-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Sanjay Govind Ghatage, etc.6

Adv. D. M. Potdar

Santosh Gavind Ghatage

Tanaji Hindurao Ghatage

Prakash Hindurao Ghatage

Vinayak Shankar Ghatage

Sunil Shankar Ghatage

Anil Shankar Ghatage

Respondent(s)

Pandurang Shamrao Ghatage, etc.6 Advocate - Ajit S. Patil

Prakash Shamrao Ghatage

Maruti Shamrao Ghatage

Sadashiv Vishnu Ghatage

Ashok Pandurang Ghatage

Dilip Pandurang Ghatage

Suresh Pandurang Ghatage

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

22-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

21-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

25-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

26-09-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

09-06-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application filed by Defendant Nos. 1 and 4 to set aside the ex-parte order dated 08/06/2022 in a property partition suit has been allowed. The court set aside the ex-parte order against these defendants, recognizing that proceeding without their evidence would prejudice their rights in the immovable property dispute. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 2,000 each on the defendants for unjustifiable delay in filing the application, with Rs. 2,000 to be paid to the plaintiffs and Rs. 2,000 to T.L.S.C. Radhanagari. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by Defendant Nos. 1 and 4 to set aside the ex-parte order dated 08/06/2022 in a property partition suit has been allowed. The court set aside the ex-parte order against these defendants, recognizing that proceeding without their evidence would prejudice their rights in the immovable property dispute. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 2,000 each on the defendants for unjustifiable delay in filing the application, with Rs. 2,000 to be paid to the plaintiffs and Rs. 2,000 to T.L.S.C. Radhanagari. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case