State of Maharashtra thr Pl.St.Radhanagari vs Vilas Piraji Sable Advocate - C. S. Bongarde — 1600030/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,447,354(a),323. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190002702016
Filing Number
1600176/2016
Filing Date
25-05-2016
Registration No
1600030/2016
Registration Date
25-05-2016
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
127
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr Pl.St.Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Vilas Piraji Sable Advocate - C. S. Bongarde
Baban Piraji Sable
Adv. C. S. Bongarde
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vilas Piraji Sable & Baban Piraji Sable (RCC 1600030/2016) Court Decision: Both accused were acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 354-A (sexual harassment), 341 (wrongful restraint), 447 (criminal trespass), 323 (causing hurt), and 504 (intentional insult), read with Section 34. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to: (1) inconsistencies between the alleged incident date (31/05/2015) and witness testimony; (2) unexplained 4+ month delay in filing the FIR; (3) independent eyewitnesses (PW-3, PW-6) contradicting the sexual harassment allegations and corroborating only a quarrel over brick placement; (4) an underlying property dispute between the accused and a related witness, creating reasonable doubt about the allegations' genuineness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vilas Piraji Sable & Baban Piraji Sable (RCC 1600030/2016) Court Decision: Both accused were acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 354-A (sexual harassment), 341 (wrongful restraint), 447 (criminal trespass), 323 (causing hurt), and 504 (intentional insult), read with Section 34. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to: (1) inconsistencies between the alleged incident date (31/05/2015) and witness testimony; (2) unexplained 4+ month delay in filing the FIR; (3) independent eyewitnesses (PW-3, PW-6) contradicting the sexual harassment allegations and corroborating only a quarrel over brick placement; (4) an underlying property dispute between the accused and a related witness, creating reasonable doubt about the allegations' genuineness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts