Balwant Sadashiv Patil vs Babasaheb Sadashiv Patil, etc.1 Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil — 107/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190002512022
Filing Number
130/2022
Filing Date
19-Mar-2022
Registration No
107/2022
Registration Date
19-Mar-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Balwant Sadashiv Patil
Adv. B. D. Shelake
Respondent(s)
-
1.Babasaheb Sadashiv Patil, etc.1 Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil
-
2.Aapasaheb Sadashiv Patil
Adv. P. B. Dalvi
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
03-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
23-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
26-Jul-2024
Dismissal Order
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Jun-2024
Dismissal Order
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
30-Apr-2024
Dismissal Order
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
02-Apr-2024
Dismissal Order
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Feb-2024
Dismissal Order
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
09-Jan-2024
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
10-Nov-2023
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
26-Sep-2023
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Aug-2023
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Jun-2023
List of Witness
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
10-Mar-2023
List of Witness
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
10-Jan-2023
Issues
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
24-Nov-2022
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
24-Nov-2022
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: In R.C.S No. 107/2022 (Balwant Sadashiv Patil v. Babasaheb Sadashiv Patil), the court allowed the defendants' application for temporary injunction. The plaintiff is restrained from obstructing the defendants' construction on land bearing Gat No. 900 at village Chandre, Kolhapur, until the suit is disposed. The court found that defendants rebutted the presumption of the plaintiff's registered relinquishment deed and that the balance of convenience favored the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Nov-2022
Issues
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
15-Nov-2022
Order on Exh
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
11-Nov-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Oct-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Sep-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
06-Sep-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
02-Aug-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
08-Jul-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
07-Jun-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
29-Apr-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
12-Apr-2022
W.S. and Say
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Apr-2022
W.S. and Say
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
24-Mar-2022
W.S. and Say
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 107/2022
Case Summary: In R.C.S No. 107/2022 (Balwant Sadashiv Patil v. Babasaheb Sadashiv Patil), the court allowed the defendants' application for temporary injunction. The plaintiff is restrained from obstructing the defendants' construction on land bearing Gat No. 900 at village Chandre, Kolhapur, until the suit is disposed. The court found that defendants rebutted the presumption of the plaintiff's registered relinquishment deed and that the balance of convenience favored the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts