Balwant Sadashiv Patil vs Babasaheb Sadashiv Patil, etc.1 Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil — 107/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190002512022
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
130/2022
Filing Date
19-03-2022
Registration No
107/2022
Registration Date
19-03-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balwant Sadashiv Patil
Adv. B. D. Shelake
Respondent(s)
Babasaheb Sadashiv Patil, etc.1 Advocate - Vinayak B. Patil
Aapasaheb Sadashiv Patil
Adv. P. B. Dalvi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-10-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In R.C.S No. 107/2022 (Balwant Sadashiv Patil v. Babasaheb Sadashiv Patil), the court allowed the defendants' application for temporary injunction. The plaintiff is restrained from obstructing the defendants' construction on land bearing Gat No. 900 at village Chandre, Kolhapur, until the suit is disposed. The court found that defendants rebutted the presumption of the plaintiff's registered relinquishment deed and that the balance of convenience favored the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In R.C.S No. 107/2022 (Balwant Sadashiv Patil v. Babasaheb Sadashiv Patil), the court allowed the defendants' application for temporary injunction. The plaintiff is restrained from obstructing the defendants' construction on land bearing Gat No. 900 at village Chandre, Kolhapur, until the suit is disposed. The court found that defendants rebutted the presumption of the plaintiff's registered relinquishment deed and that the balance of convenience favored the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts