Ashok Shankar Patil vs Rajaram Shankar Patil Deceased Advocate - R. A. Giribuva — 79/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190002052024
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-03-2024
Filing Number
101/2024
Filing Date
01-04-2024
Registration No
79/2024
Registration Date
02-04-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Shankar Patil
Adv. S. P. Wagvekar
Respondent(s)
Rajaram Shankar Patil Deceased Advocate - R. A. Giribuva
Sushila Ananda Patil
Dipak Ananda Patil
Dipali Shakti Patil
Ganpati Yashwant Patil
Ankush Dhondi Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. 79/2024 Outcome: The application filed by Defendants 1A, 1C, and 2-6 to set aside a "No Written Statement" order was dismissed. The court found that no such order had actually been passed against the defendants, rendering the application moot. Despite summons being served on 18/04/2024, defendants voluntarily failed to file their written statement, and the plaintiff's opposition to their application was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. 79/2024 Outcome: The application filed by Defendants 1A, 1C, and 2-6 to set aside a "No Written Statement" order was dismissed. The court found that no such order had actually been passed against the defendants, rendering the application moot. Despite summons being served on 18/04/2024, defendants voluntarily failed to file their written statement, and the plaintiff's opposition to their application was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts