Ashok Shankar Patil vs Rajaram Shankar Patil Deceased Advocate - R. A. Giribuva — 79/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190002052024

e-Filing Number

30-03-2024

Filing Number

101/2024

Filing Date

01-Apr-2024

Registration No

79/2024

Registration Date

02-Apr-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Shankar Patil

    Adv. S. P. Wagvekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajaram Shankar Patil Deceased Advocate - R. A. Giribuva

  2. 2.Sushila Ananda Patil

  3. 3.Dipak Ananda Patil

  4. 4.Dipali Shakti Patil

  5. 5.Ganpati Yashwant Patil

  6. 6.Ankush Dhondi Patil

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 28-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 03-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  11. 10-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  12. 31-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  13. 24-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 10-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  15. 07-May-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 07-May-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. 79/2024 Outcome: The application filed by Defendants 1A, 1C, and 2-6 to set aside a "No Written Statement" order was dismissed. The court found that no such order had actually been passed against the defendants, rendering the application moot. Despite summons being served on 18/04/2024, defendants voluntarily failed to file their written statement, and the plaintiff's opposition to their application was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 07-May-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  18. 23-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  19. 11-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  20. 11-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  21. 06-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  22. 27-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  23. 26-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  24. 18-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  25. 29-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  26. 05-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 01-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 79/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. 79/2024 Outcome: The application filed by Defendants 1A, 1C, and 2-6 to set aside a "No Written Statement" order was dismissed. The court found that no such order had actually been passed against the defendants, rendering the application moot. Despite summons being served on 18/04/2024, defendants voluntarily failed to file their written statement, and the plaintiff's opposition to their application was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case