State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Abhijeet Ramchandra Salvi Advocate - A. S. Huparikar — 1600070/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190002052017
Filing Number
1600194/2017
Filing Date
25-04-2017
Registration No
1600070/2017
Registration Date
25-04-2017
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0042
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Abhijeet Ramchandra Salvi Advocate - A. S. Huparikar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 19-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1600070/2017 Court Decision: The accused, Abhijeet Ramchandra Salvi, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, 427, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution presented five witnesses, including an eyewitness and scene panchs, their testimonies contained contradictions and failed to establish that the accused's motorcycle caused the collision with the state transport bus. The bus driver's negligence could not be ruled out, and without credible evidence linking the accused's rash/negligent driving to the accident, conviction was unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1600070/2017 Court Decision: The accused, Abhijeet Ramchandra Salvi, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, 427, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution presented five witnesses, including an eyewitness and scene panchs, their testimonies contained contradictions and failed to establish that the accused's motorcycle caused the collision with the state transport bus. The bus driver's negligence could not be ruled out, and without credible evidence linking the accused's rash/negligent driving to the accident, conviction was unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts