State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Sheetal Sanjay Alavkar — 79/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190001972025
Filing Number
125/2025
Filing Date
26-Mar-2025
Registration No
79/2025
Registration Date
26-Mar-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 11-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
351
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sheetal Sanjay Alavkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged accused Sheetal Sanjay Alavkar from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the prosecution failed to file the essential Chemical Analyzer report since the offense's registration in 2025 and could not secure the accused's presence, making it purposeless to keep the case pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
10-Mar-2026
Filing of Surety
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Dec-2025
Filing of Surety
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
09-Oct-2025
Filing of Surety
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
01-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 79/2025
The Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged accused Sheetal Sanjay Alavkar from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the prosecution failed to file the essential Chemical Analyzer report since the offense's registration in 2025 and could not secure the accused's presence, making it purposeless to keep the case pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts