State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Ganpati Govind Patil — 26/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65.E. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190001842023
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
88/2023
Filing Date
28-03-2023
Registration No
26/2023
Registration Date
28-03-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
FIR Details
FIR Number
230
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Ganpati Govind Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 24-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In this Summary Criminal Case No. 26/2023, the State vs. Ganpati Govind Patil, the court examined evidence regarding an illegal liquor seizure. The prosecution witness testified about recovering approximately 35 liters of illicit liquor and related items worth Rs. 2040 from the accused during a raid on 30/11/2022. The defense cross-examination challenged procedural irregularities, including the absence of proper local panchas (witnesses) and the non-production of seized material in court. The court accepted the examination-in-chief and cross-examination as complete, with no re-examination ordered (dated 03/01/2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this Summary Criminal Case No. 26/2023, the State vs. Ganpati Govind Patil, the court examined evidence regarding an illegal liquor seizure. The prosecution witness testified about recovering approximately 35 liters of illicit liquor and related items worth Rs. 2040 from the accused during a raid on 30/11/2022. The defense cross-examination challenged procedural irregularities, including the absence of proper local panchas (witnesses) and the non-production of seized material in court. The court accepted the examination-in-chief and cross-examination as complete, with no re-examination ordered (dated 03/01/2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts