State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Arvind Vasant Patil — 76/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO190001472026

Case disposed

Filing Number

99/2026

Filing Date

14-03-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

14-03-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Arvind Vasant Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

14-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Arvind Vasant Patil (76/2026) Arvind Vasant Patil was charged with rash and negligent driving under Section 281 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving an Eco Car dangerously on 06/03/2026 at Sarawade, Kolhapur. He voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat and requested minimum punishment, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court accepted his guilty plea and, considering his voluntary admission, lack of criminal record, and financial hardship, imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 700 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the statutory minimum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Arvind Vasant Patil (76/2026) Arvind Vasant Patil was charged with rash and negligent driving under Section 281 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving an Eco Car dangerously on 06/03/2026 at Sarawade, Kolhapur. He voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat and requested minimum punishment, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court accepted his guilty plea and, considering his voluntary admission, lack of criminal record, and financial hardship, imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 700 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the statutory minimum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case