State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Arvind Vasant Patil — 76/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190001472026
Filing Number
99/2026
Filing Date
14-03-2026
Registration No
76/2026
Registration Date
14-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Arvind Vasant Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Arvind Vasant Patil (76/2026) Arvind Vasant Patil was charged with rash and negligent driving under Section 281 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving an Eco Car dangerously on 06/03/2026 at Sarawade, Kolhapur. He voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat and requested minimum punishment, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court accepted his guilty plea and, considering his voluntary admission, lack of criminal record, and financial hardship, imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 700 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the statutory minimum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Arvind Vasant Patil (76/2026) Arvind Vasant Patil was charged with rash and negligent driving under Section 281 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving an Eco Car dangerously on 06/03/2026 at Sarawade, Kolhapur. He voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat and requested minimum punishment, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court accepted his guilty plea and, considering his voluntary admission, lack of criminal record, and financial hardship, imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 700 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the statutory minimum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts