State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Ananada Sanjay Soanavane — 75/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190001462026
Filing Number
98/2026
Filing Date
14-Mar-2026
Registration No
75/2026
Registration Date
14-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
346
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ananada Sanjay Soanavane
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 75/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ananda Sanjay Sonawane under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for recklessly driving a motorcycle on 30/11/2025 in a manner endangering human life. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat. Sentence: Fined Rs. 700, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. The court imposed lenient punishment below the statutory minimum, considering the accused's voluntary plea, lack of criminal record, poor financial condition, and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
14-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 75/2026
Case Summary: 75/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ananda Sanjay Sonawane under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for recklessly driving a motorcycle on 30/11/2025 in a manner endangering human life. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat. Sentence: Fined Rs. 700, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. The court imposed lenient punishment below the statutory minimum, considering the accused's voluntary plea, lack of criminal record, poor financial condition, and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts