State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Netaji Sadashiv Kambale — 74/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO190001452026

Filing Number

97/2026

Filing Date

14-Mar-2026

Registration No

74/2026

Registration Date

14-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Netaji Sadashiv Kambale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 74/2026 The court convicted Netaji Sadashiv Kamble under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for rash and negligent driving of a truck on 06/01/2026 that endangered human life. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 700 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), considering the accused's voluntary plea, absence of criminal antecedence, and financial circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 74/2026 The court convicted Netaji Sadashiv Kamble under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for rash and negligent driving of a truck on 06/01/2026 that endangered human life. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 700 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), considering the accused's voluntary plea, absence of criminal antecedence, and financial circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case