State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Ritesh Ramesh Kambale — 72/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190001432026
Filing Number
95/2026
Filing Date
14-03-2026
Registration No
72/2026
Registration Date
14-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
334
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Ritesh Ramesh Kambale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ritesh Ramesh Kamble (72/2026) Ritesh Ramesh Kamble was convicted under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for rash/negligent driving of a motorcycle on a public road endangering others' safety on 28/11/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat, citing poor financial condition and family dependence, requesting minimum punishment. The court accepted his guilty plea and imposed lenient punishment: a fine of ₹700 with 2 days simple imprisonment in default, citing his voluntary admission, absence of criminal antecedents, financial hardship, and family dependence as mitigating factors warranting reduced sentence below statutory minimums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ritesh Ramesh Kamble (72/2026) Ritesh Ramesh Kamble was convicted under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for rash/negligent driving of a motorcycle on a public road endangering others' safety on 28/11/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat, citing poor financial condition and family dependence, requesting minimum punishment. The court accepted his guilty plea and imposed lenient punishment: a fine of ₹700 with 2 days simple imprisonment in default, citing his voluntary admission, absence of criminal antecedents, financial hardship, and family dependence as mitigating factors warranting reduced sentence below statutory minimums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts