State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Vikram Dattatraya Patil — 71/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190001422026
Filing Number
94/2026
Filing Date
14-03-2026
Registration No
71/2026
Registration Date
14-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
407
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Vikram Dattatraya Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Dattatray Patil (71/2026) Vikram Dattatray Patil was convicted under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a motorcycle while under the influence of alcohol on 31/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court accepted the guilty plea and imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 2,000 with 2 days simple imprisonment in default, citing the accused's voluntary confession, absence of prior criminal record, and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Dattatray Patil (71/2026) Vikram Dattatray Patil was convicted under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a motorcycle while under the influence of alcohol on 31/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the National Lok Adalat, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court accepted the guilty plea and imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 2,000 with 2 days simple imprisonment in default, citing the accused's voluntary confession, absence of prior criminal record, and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts