State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Tanaji Namdev Kambale — 70/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190001412026
Filing Number
93/2026
Filing Date
14-03-2026
Registration No
70/2026
Registration Date
14-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Tanaji Namdev Kambale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tanaji Namdev Kambale (70/2026) Tanaji Namdev Kambale, aged 55, was charged with driving a motorcycle under the influence of alcohol on 11/01/2026 in violation of Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty during National Lok Adalat proceedings on 14/03/2026, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court accepted his guilty plea and, considering his voluntary confession, absence of prior criminal record, and financial hardship, imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 2,000 with two days simple imprisonment as default alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tanaji Namdev Kambale (70/2026) Tanaji Namdev Kambale, aged 55, was charged with driving a motorcycle under the influence of alcohol on 11/01/2026 in violation of Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty during National Lok Adalat proceedings on 14/03/2026, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court accepted his guilty plea and, considering his voluntary confession, absence of prior criminal record, and financial hardship, imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 2,000 with two days simple imprisonment as default alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts