State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Tanaji Namdev Kambale — 70/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO190001412026

Filing Number

93/2026

Filing Date

14-Mar-2026

Registration No

70/2026

Registration Date

14-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

Radhanagari Polilce Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tanaji Namdev Kambale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tanaji Namdev Kambale (70/2026) Tanaji Namdev Kambale, aged 55, was charged with driving a motorcycle under the influence of alcohol on 11/01/2026 in violation of Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty during National Lok Adalat proceedings on 14/03/2026, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court accepted his guilty plea and, considering his voluntary confession, absence of prior criminal record, and financial hardship, imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 2,000 with two days simple imprisonment as default alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 70/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tanaji Namdev Kambale (70/2026) Tanaji Namdev Kambale, aged 55, was charged with driving a motorcycle under the influence of alcohol on 11/01/2026 in violation of Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty during National Lok Adalat proceedings on 14/03/2026, citing poor financial condition and family dependence. The court accepted his guilty plea and, considering his voluntary confession, absence of prior criminal record, and financial hardship, imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 2,000 with two days simple imprisonment as default alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case