Shri.Vasant Dinkar Dhokre etc. 5 vs Grampanchayat Adoli,Dublewadi thr. Sarpanch/Gramsevak — 1600040/2017
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190001372017
Filing Number
1600065/2017
Filing Date
21-Mar-2017
Registration No
1600040/2017
Registration Date
23-Mar-2017
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri.Vasant Dinkar Dhokre etc. 5
Adv. Kiran G. patil
-
2.Shri.Pandit Dinkar Dhokre
Adv. K. G. Patil
-
3.Shri.Pandurang Dinkar Dhokre
Adv. K. G. Patil
-
4.Shri.Ashok Dinkar Dhokre
Adv. K. G. Patil
-
5.Shri.Dinkar Dhaku Dhokre
Adv. K. G. Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.Grampanchayat Adoli,Dublewadi thr. Sarpanch/Gramsevak
Case History
-
04-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Arguments
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
18-Apr-2026
Arguments
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
22-Jan-2026
Arguments
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
08-Jan-2026
Arguments
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
29-Nov-2025
Arguments
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
01-Nov-2025
Arguments
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
18-Oct-2025
Arguments
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Sep-2025
Arguments
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
08-Aug-2025
Steps
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Jun-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
03-May-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Mar-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
18-Jan-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Nov-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Oct-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Aug-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Jul-2024
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
06-Jul-2024
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
15-Jun-2024
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
06-May-2024
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Apr-2024
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Mar-2024
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
02-Mar-2024
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
03-Feb-2024
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Dec-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
08-Nov-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Oct-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
15-Sep-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
02-Sep-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Aug-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Aug-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
15-Jul-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Jun-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
06-May-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Apr-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
01-Apr-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
18-Mar-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
27-Feb-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Feb-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Feb-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Jan-2023
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
03-Dec-2022
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Nov-2022
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
01-Oct-2022
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Sep-2022
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Aug-2022
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Jul-2022
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
23-Jun-2022
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
09-Jun-2022
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Apr-2022
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
24-Mar-2022
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Feb-2022
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
27-Jan-2022
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
06-Jan-2022
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
18-Dec-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Nov-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
30-Oct-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Oct-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
24-Aug-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Jun-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
03-Apr-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
10-Mar-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Jan-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
09-Dec-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
25-Nov-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Oct-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
07-Oct-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Aug-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
01-Jul-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Jun-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
06-Jun-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
27-May-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
11-May-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Apr-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Mar-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
28-Feb-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Feb-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
06-Feb-2020
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: RCS 40/2017 Outcome: Petition allowed. The plaintiff was granted liberty to adduce secondary evidence within the parameters of the Indian Evidence Act (dated 06/02/2020). Key Facts: The plaintiff sought permission to introduce secondary evidence for three documents: a village panchayat resolution and two government notices. The originals were held by the defendant (Gram Panchayat) and Tahasildar office respectively, and despite repeated requests, were not produced. When the plaintiff inquired with the Tahasildar's office, these documents were not found in their records. Court's Decision: Citing the Indian Evidence Act provisions and Bombay High Court precedent, the court held that parties are at liberty to lead secondary evidence, provided they prove the existence and execution of original documents and fulfill conditions under Section 65 of the Evidence Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Feb-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
01-Feb-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
18-Jan-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Jan-2020
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
30-Nov-2019
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Nov-2019
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Oct-2019
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Oct-2019
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
07-Sep-2019
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
30-Aug-2019
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Jul-2019
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
13-Jul-2019
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
06-Jul-2019
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Jun-2019
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
12-Jun-2019
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
06-Jun-2019
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
24-Apr-2019
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
11-Apr-2019
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Mar-2019
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Feb-2019
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
05-Jan-2019
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
28-Nov-2018
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
24-Oct-2018
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Sep-2018
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
08-Sep-2018
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
18-Aug-2018
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
30-Jul-2018
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
11-Jun-2018
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
11-Apr-2018
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
12-Mar-2018
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
29-Jan-2018
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
09-Dec-2017
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
18-Nov-2017
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
07-Oct-2017
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
09-Sep-2017
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
30-Aug-2017
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
27-Jul-2017
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Jun-2017
Ex_Party Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Apr-2017
Awaiting Summons
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
27-Mar-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Mar-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 1600040/2017
Case Summary: RCS 40/2017 Outcome: Petition allowed. The plaintiff was granted liberty to adduce secondary evidence within the parameters of the Indian Evidence Act (dated 06/02/2020). Key Facts: The plaintiff sought permission to introduce secondary evidence for three documents: a village panchayat resolution and two government notices. The originals were held by the defendant (Gram Panchayat) and Tahasildar office respectively, and despite repeated requests, were not produced. When the plaintiff inquired with the Tahasildar's office, these documents were not found in their records. Court's Decision: Citing the Indian Evidence Act provisions and Bombay High Court precedent, the court held that parties are at liberty to lead secondary evidence, provided they prove the existence and execution of original documents and fulfill conditions under Section 65 of the Evidence Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts