Smt. Malubai Shamrao Kudle etc. 3 vs Shri. Baburao Ganpati Kudle etc. 16 Advocate - Sachindra K. Patil — 57/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190001352021

Filing Number

52/2021

Filing Date

04-Mar-2021

Registration No

57/2021

Registration Date

23-Mar-2021

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Malubai Shamrao Kudle etc. 3

    Adv. V. D. Mangore

  2. 2.Shri. Arun Shamrao Kudale

  3. 3.Shri. Vilas Shamrao Kudale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri. Baburao Ganpati Kudle etc. 16 Advocate - Sachindra K. Patil

  2. 2.Vishnu Ganpati Kudle

  3. 3.Shantabai Satappa Ramane

  4. 4.Smt. Anubai Dnyandev Kudle

  5. 5.Sou. Ambubai Dinkar Kokate

  6. 6.Sanjay Dnyandev Kudle

  7. 7.Sou. Sau Vilas Salvi

  8. 8.smt. Indubai Shripati Kudle

  9. 9.Raju Shripati Kudale

  10. 10.Sou. Chaya Rajendra Yadav

  11. 11.Sou. Anandi Shivaji Patil

  12. 12.Shivaji Shripati Kudale

  13. 13.Smt. Akatai Maruti Kudle

  14. 14.Krushnat Maruti Kudale

  15. 15.Vijay Maruti Kudale

  16. 16.Sou. Vaishali Vitthal Patil

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 21-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 14-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 16-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 29-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 27-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  11. 05-May-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The application filed by Defendants Nos. 3, 5, 7, 10, and 16 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order dated 28/02/2022 has been allowed. The court permitted these defendants to file their written statements, applying the principle of natural justice that no party should be condemned unheard. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 700/- payable to the plaintiffs, considering the one-year delay in filing the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 05-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  13. 13-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 13-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  15. 05-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  16. 05-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  17. 17-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  18. 26-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  19. 21-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  20. 24-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  21. 20-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  22. 05-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  23. 04-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  24. 16-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  25. 04-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  26. 28-Jul-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  27. 27-Jun-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  28. 18-Apr-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  29. 10-Feb-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  30. 25-Nov-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  31. 01-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  32. 04-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  33. 12-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  34. 17-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  35. 22-Apr-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  36. 29-Mar-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  37. 28-Feb-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  38. 09-Feb-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  39. 22-Dec-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  40. 24-Nov-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  41. 06-Oct-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  42. 08-Sep-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  43. 16-Aug-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  44. 26-Jul-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  45. 14-Jun-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  46. 15-Apr-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  47. 24-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 04-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by Defendants Nos. 3, 5, 7, 10, and 16 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order dated 28/02/2022 has been allowed. The court permitted these defendants to file their written statements, applying the principle of natural justice that no party should be condemned unheard. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 700/- payable to the plaintiffs, considering the one-year delay in filing the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case