Shri. Vasant Dinkar Dhokare etc. 5 vs Shri. Dnyandev Dattatray Patil etc. 11 Advocate - S. D. Bhosale — 1600013/2014

Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190000972014

Filing Number

1600031/2014

Filing Date

03-Feb-2014

Registration No

1600013/2014

Registration Date

03-Feb-2014

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 11-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri. Vasant Dinkar Dhokare etc. 5

    Adv. Kiran G. patil

  2. 2.Pandit Dinkar Dhokare

  3. 3.Pandurang Dinkar Dhokare

  4. 4.Ashok Dinkar Dhokare

  5. 5.Dinkar Dhaku Dhokare

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri. Dnyandev Dattatray Patil etc. 11 Advocate - S. D. Bhosale

  2. 2.Bharat Namdev Patil

  3. 3.Balaso Dhondirao Chavan

  4. 4.Vijay Rajaram Patil

  5. 5.Shivaji Pandurang Patil

  6. 6.Dhondiram Ganpati Patil

  7. 7.Rajaram Maruti Patil

  8. 8.Dattatray Laxman Dhokare

  9. 9.Shivaji Sakharam Jadhav

  10. 10.Kundlik Tukaram Sutar

  11. 11.Ashok gundu Jadhav

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 29-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 01-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 20-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 08-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 21-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  11. 03-May-2025

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  12. 29-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  13. 03-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 03-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  15. 18-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  16. 16-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  17. 04-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  18. 13-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  19. 14-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  20. 03-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  21. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  22. 10-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  23. 20-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  24. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  25. 02-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  26. 03-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  27. 16-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  28. 08-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  29. 13-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  30. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  31. 02-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  32. 05-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  33. 15-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  34. 17-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  35. 18-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  36. 21-Jan-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  37. 03-Dec-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  38. 05-Nov-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  39. 01-Oct-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  40. 17-Sep-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  41. 20-Aug-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  42. 16-Jul-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  43. 23-Jun-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  44. 09-Jun-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  45. 24-Mar-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  46. 17-Feb-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  47. 27-Jan-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  48. 06-Jan-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  49. 18-Dec-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  50. 20-Nov-2021

    Dismissal Order

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  51. 12-Oct-2021

    Dismissal Order

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  52. 24-Aug-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  53. 19-Jun-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  54. 03-Apr-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  55. 10-Mar-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  56. 13-Jan-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  57. 02-Dec-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  58. 07-Oct-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  59. 05-Aug-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  60. 10-Jun-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  61. 28-May-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  62. 12-May-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  63. 18-Apr-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  64. 29-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  65. 04-Jan-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  66. 30-Nov-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  67. 16-Nov-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  68. 19-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  69. 05-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  70. 07-Sep-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  71. 03-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  72. 13-Jul-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  73. 06-Jul-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  74. 19-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  75. 12-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  76. 06-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  77. 24-Apr-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  78. 11-Apr-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  79. 16-Mar-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  80. 16-Feb-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  81. 05-Jan-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  82. 28-Nov-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  83. 24-Oct-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  84. 19-Sep-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  85. 08-Sep-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  86. 18-Aug-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  87. 08-Aug-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  88. 27-Jun-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  89. 11-Apr-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  90. 14-Mar-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  91. 24-Jan-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  92. 09-Dec-2017

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  93. 18-Nov-2017

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  94. 07-Oct-2017

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  95. 09-Sep-2017

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  96. 28-Aug-2017

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  97. 17-Jul-2017

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  98. 29-Apr-2017

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  99. 18-Mar-2017

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  100. 21-Jan-2017

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  101. 16-Dec-2016

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  102. 09-Nov-2016

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  103. 15-Jul-2016

    Steps

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  104. 05-Jul-2016

    Order

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  105. 07-Jun-2016

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  106. 15-Feb-2016

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  107. 25-Nov-2015

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  108. 18-Sep-2015

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  109. 09-Jul-2015

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  110. 20-Apr-2015

    Hearing

  111. 07-Mar-2015

    Hearing

  112. 30-Dec-2014

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  113. 30-Dec-2014

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application to appoint a Court Commissioner to measure disputed properties (Gat nos. 208 and 206) in Regular Civil Suit No. 13/2014. The rejection was based on two grounds: (1) issues had not yet been settled in the case, making the application premature under Bombay High Court precedent, and (2) the plaintiffs inappropriately sought an Advocate as Commissioner instead of requesting a revenue officer, suggesting the application was filed to delay proceedings. The application is rejected with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  114. 30-Dec-2014

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

  115. 18-Dec-2014

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

  116. 06-Oct-2014

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

  117. 25-Sep-2014

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

  118. 16-Aug-2014

    Reply/Say

  119. 11-Aug-2014

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

  120. 23-Jul-2014

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

  121. 14-Jul-2014

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

  122. 05-Jul-2014

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

  123. 30-Apr-2014

    Written Statement

  124. 11-Apr-2014

    Written Statement

  125. 10-Apr-2014

    Written Statement

  126. 02-Apr-2014

    Written Statement

  127. 13-Mar-2014

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  128. 06-Mar-2014

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  129. 03-Feb-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  130. 03-Feb-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1600013/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application to appoint a Court Commissioner to measure disputed properties (Gat nos. 208 and 206) in Regular Civil Suit No. 13/2014. The rejection was based on two grounds: (1) issues had not yet been settled in the case, making the application premature under Bombay High Court precedent, and (2) the plaintiffs inappropriately sought an Advocate as Commissioner instead of requesting a revenue officer, suggesting the application was filed to delay proceedings. The application is rejected with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case