Shri.Maruti Vithu Kavde vs Shri.Prakash Rau Kavde Advocate - U. D. Patil — 1600017/2017

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 07-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190000722017

Filing Number

1600022/2017

Filing Date

24-Jan-2017

Registration No

1600017/2017

Registration Date

03-Feb-2017

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri.Maruti Vithu Kavde

    Adv. A. M. Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri.Prakash Rau Kavde Advocate - U. D. Patil

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    Steps

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  6. 25-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  7. 07-Oct-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  8. 22-Aug-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  9. 08-Jul-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  10. 03-May-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  11. 20-Mar-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  12. 07-Mar-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  13. 24-Jan-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  14. 03-Dec-2024

    Dismissal Order

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  15. 24-Sep-2024

    Steps

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  16. 30-Aug-2024

    Steps

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  17. 06-Aug-2024

    Steps

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  18. 18-Jun-2024

    Steps

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  19. 23-Apr-2024

    Steps

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  20. 12-Mar-2024

    Steps

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  21. 06-Feb-2024

    Steps

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  22. 05-Jan-2024

    Steps

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  23. 05-Dec-2023

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  24. 31-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  25. 15-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  26. 18-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  27. 18-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  28. 25-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  29. 18-Mar-2023

    Awaiting Report of Commissioner

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  30. 17-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  31. 23-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  32. 02-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  33. 27-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  34. 15-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  35. 30-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  36. 18-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  37. 03-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  38. 07-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  39. 29-Apr-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  40. 19-Apr-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  41. 22-Feb-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  42. 18-Jan-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  43. 23-Nov-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  44. 05-Oct-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  45. 14-Sep-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  46. 27-Jul-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  47. 15-Jun-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  48. 20-Apr-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  49. 22-Mar-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  50. 22-Feb-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  51. 16-Feb-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  52. 02-Feb-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  53. 08-Jan-2021

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  54. 06-Nov-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  55. 25-Sep-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  56. 24-Jul-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  57. 20-Mar-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  58. 11-Mar-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  59. 28-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  60. 01-Jan-2020

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  61. 20-Nov-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  62. 14-Sep-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  63. 21-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  64. 17-Jul-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  65. 24-Apr-2019

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  66. 11-Apr-2019

    Issues

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  67. 12-Mar-2019

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for interim injunction relief. The defendant is temporarily restrained from disturbing or obstructing the plaintiff's right to use a 4-foot-wide lane providing access to his ancestral property (C.S. No. 58) from the main road until the final hearing of the suit. The court found a prima facie case in plaintiff's favor, determined the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and concluded he would suffer irreparable loss if the relief was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  68. 12-Mar-2019

    Issues

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  69. 16-Jan-2019

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  70. 27-Nov-2018

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  71. 16-Oct-2018

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  72. 04-Sep-2018

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  73. 07-Aug-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  74. 17-Jul-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  75. 12-Jun-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  76. 21-Mar-2018

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  77. 09-Feb-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  78. 12-Jan-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  79. 24-Nov-2017

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  80. 13-Oct-2017

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  81. 19-Sep-2017

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  82. 29-Aug-2017

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  83. 19-Jul-2017

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  84. 25-Apr-2017

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  85. 07-Apr-2017

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  86. 21-Mar-2017

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  87. 28-Feb-2017

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

  88. 06-Feb-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  89. 24-Jan-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1600017/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for interim injunction relief. The defendant is temporarily restrained from disturbing or obstructing the plaintiff's right to use a 4-foot-wide lane providing access to his ancestral property (C.S. No. 58) from the main road until the final hearing of the suit. The court found a prima facie case in plaintiff's favor, determined the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and concluded he would suffer irreparable loss if the relief was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case