Shri.Maruti Vithu Kavde vs Shri.Prakash Rau Kavde Advocate - U. D. Patil — 1600017/2017
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190000722017
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
1600022/2017
Filing Date
24-01-2017
Registration No
1600017/2017
Registration Date
03-02-2017
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri.Maruti Vithu Kavde
Adv. A. M. Patil
Respondent(s)
Shri.Prakash Rau Kavde Advocate - U. D. Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Steps
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 23-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 23-12-2025 | Steps |
| 25-11-2025 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for interim injunction relief. The defendant is temporarily restrained from disturbing or obstructing the plaintiff's right to use a 4-foot-wide lane providing access to his ancestral property (C.S. No. 58) from the main road until the final hearing of the suit. The court found a prima facie case in plaintiff's favor, determined the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and concluded he would suffer irreparable loss if the relief was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for interim injunction relief. The defendant is temporarily restrained from disturbing or obstructing the plaintiff's right to use a 4-foot-wide lane providing access to his ancestral property (C.S. No. 58) from the main road until the final hearing of the suit. The court found a prima facie case in plaintiff's favor, determined the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and concluded he would suffer irreparable loss if the relief was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts