Archana Lahu Patil vs Phulabai Shivaji Kuditrekar Advocate - S. L. Waghurdekar — 14/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,36. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO190000522025
e-Filing Number
16-01-2025
Filing Number
18/2025
Filing Date
16-Jan-2025
Registration No
14/2025
Registration Date
17-Jan-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Archana Lahu Patil
Adv. S. P. Wagvekar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Phulabai Shivaji Kuditrekar Advocate - S. L. Waghurdekar
-
2.Shantabai Ravana Kadam
-
3.Shivaji Nathaji Dawari
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
Written Statement
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No.1 to set aside the "No Written Statement" and "No Say" order against her has been allowed. The court found that proceeding with the partition suit regarding immovable properties without the defendant's written statement would prejudice her valuable rights. Defendant No.1 is ordered to pay costs of Rs.700/- (Rs.400/- to the plaintiff and Rs.300/- to the court) on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
16-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
21-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
24-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
18-Aug-2025
Written Statement
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
04-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
19-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
15-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
17-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
-
20-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 14/2025
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No.1 to set aside the "No Written Statement" and "No Say" order against her has been allowed. The court found that proceeding with the partition suit regarding immovable properties without the defendant's written statement would prejudice her valuable rights. Defendant No.1 is ordered to pay costs of Rs.700/- (Rs.400/- to the plaintiff and Rs.300/- to the court) on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts